Skip to main content

Little Innovation in Multi-Play Bundles, So Far

For most U.S. broadband service providers, the creation of a multi-play bundle of services is little more than an innovation in billing that's disguised as a new offering. Therefore, we shouldn't be surprised that research has proven that consumers are still motivated by bundle price reductions, essentially creating a new class of low-margin customers.

The current multi-play scenario reminds me of the time when one of my professional mentors responded to a suggestion that I had for a pricing-related service promotion, he said "any fool can grow market share by giving away the product, and so that's not a path to intelligent market leadership."

Telephia reports more than 31 million online homes or two out of five online U.S. households subscribe to bundled services from one provider. Bundled services can include any combination of Internet, TV, phone, and mobile phone subscriptions in a single package.

According to Telephia’s Total Communications Survey for Q2 2006, double and triple-play bundles were the most popular with consumers. The Internet/TV bundle led all other service combinations with nearly 13 million households, while more than 10 million households subscribed to an Internet/Phone combination. More than five million households subscribed to a triple-play service combination of TV/Phone/Internet, while approximately 300,000 subscribed to quadruple-play bundles.

Price is the top reason why households bundle, regardless of their bundle type. Roughly one-third of households subscribing to bundled services cite that payment convenience was a strong factor in the decision to combine their service subscriptions. Across all bundle types, reliability of service was least important.

Internet and phone subscribers rate price as 'a priority' (42.8 percent); Internet and TV (46 percent); Internet, TV and phone (53.4 percent); and Internet, TV, phone, and wireless (60.9 percent).

Popular posts from this blog

AI Agents Have Memory. Where is The Security?

Enterprise AI adoption keeps running into the same wall: the moment sensitive data, model weights, or agent memory leave a tightly controlled environment, security teams lose visibility into what happens to them while the workload is actually running. Confidential computing exists to close that gap, and new research from ABI Research shows the technology has matured enough, across CPUs, GPUs, containers, and now agentic AI, to become a foundational requirement for enterprises building sovereign AI infrastructure: computing environments they control end to end rather than simply rent. Protection is Moving From CPUs to GPUs ABI Research finds that CPU-based confidential computing is closest to mass-market adoption, the product of years spent hardening chip-level isolation for general workloads. GPU-based confidential computing is now generating the strongest momentum, and for good reason. It addresses one of the largest unresolved gaps in AI security: protecting data and models while inf...