Skip to main content

Advice for Consumer Electronics Vendors

Brand loyalty just isn't what it used to be. Consumers of personal or home electronics devices face a market flooded with ever-cheaper products from manufacturers few have even heard of. Product lifespans -- even from vendors that are household names -- have grown absurdly short, and when they break, repair costs often equal replacement. Under these conditions it's no surprise that jaded consumers increasingly buy on price and features alone.

Unable to compete on price with thousands of agile startups producing commodity goods in low-wage markets that are just as good (or bad) and much cheaper than name-brands, the established vendors have a problem: how to leverage their brand recognition to retain customers.

Vamsi Sistla, ABI Research's Director of Broadband Research, has some suggestions, which are contained in the latest release of the company's "Residential Entertainment Technologies Research Service."

"Neither technology nor brand is a differentiator any more," says Sistla, "and vendors treat long-time customers exactly the same as new ones. Locking customers in with proprietary formats may work in a new market, but it won't fly in an established market. But one way CE vendors can increase loyalty is by creating trade-in channels, which allow users to return their used goods for a discount on purchase of a same-brand replacement. This not only helps retain customers, it provides a flow of recyclable parts for use in remanufactured or new lower-end products."

Another suggestion: extend product life with upgradeable designs and updates to software, drivers and applications. "Once consumers realize that if they stick to one set of brands, their products can have life-cycles longer than six months, they will become more like continuous subscribers," says Sistla. "The majority of low-end, new-brand vendors could not do that, because they don't have the R&D budget or marketing clout to make it happen."

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...