Skip to main content

A Puzzle to Monetize Social Networking Sites

Few U.S. consumers are willing to pay a modest monthly fee to use social networking sites, according to "Digital Media Habits II" -- a market study by Parks Associates.

This online survey of Internet users found 72 percent of social networking users would stop using a site if required to pay a $2 monthly fee. Likewise, nearly 40 percent would stop if a site contains too many advertisements.

These findings clearly present a puzzling challenge to the companies competing in the social networking space.

Parks Associates found 80 percent of broadband users ages 18-25 use these sites on a monthly basis; however, monetizing these users is proving to be difficult, with even category leaders such as MySpace struggling to create significant profits.

"Having a big base of loyal users is not enough," said John Barrett, director of research at Parks Associates.

To really succeed, social networking sites must consistently deliver to advertisers a desirable consumer demographic -- preferably when they are about to make a purchase decision. For example, a site devoted to car buyers presents obvious advertising opportunities while sites with broad appeal are too watered down to command a premium.

"Sites aren't able to sell a hodgepodge mix of consumers for very much," Barrett said. "It's one size fits nobody." Therefore, perhaps segmentation and targeting strategies are the key to this monetization puzzle.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...