Skip to main content

Mobile Data Services Still Priced Too High

A recent survey by ABI Research within the U.S. market, of 1000 consumers, defined the current attitudes about cellular modems. It includes one significant result that should grab the attention of mobile phone service operators.

The high-priced subscription still limits increased service adoption.

Cellular modems enable laptop computers -- and devices such as netbooks, e-readers, PNDs and digital cameras -- to access the Internet. Typical cellular modem users currently pay $50-$60/month for mobile data services from service providers.

Respondents who don't currently own cellular modems but are interested in them, however, place a significantly lower value -- somewhere between less than $10 and $30/month -- on that mobile data service.

"Over 47 percent of U.S. survey respondents had at least some interest in cellular modems and their willingness to pay for mobile data service is at half of current market prices," notes senior analyst Jeff Orr.

In the U.S. at least, consumers want a mobile data service costing no more than their home broadband access.

Part of the reason for this is that developed telecommunications markets are more likely to add a cellular modem in addition to their fixed Internet access rather than as a replacement.

Another consideration is that high-speed mobile broadband networks are not ubiquitous -- only certain regions and locations (those offering newer 3G or 4G data networks) presently have coverage, but that may improve over time.

While subscription plan cost is predicted to fall, there is a trade-off with the still less-than-perfect capacity of the networks.

"Could operators say we'll give you mobile broadband performance for $39 a month?" Orr asks. "Yes; but will they be able to deliver on that promise?" We'll have to wait and see.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...