Skip to main content

Explore Fitness Tracker and Smartwatch Demographics

User demand for wearable devices has distinct demographic segments. Age, income, and gender vary greatly among fitness tracker and smartwatch owners, according to the latest American market study by NPD Group.

Purpose-built fitness trackers, which have a strong presence in the wearables market, have gained a large mainstream following.

According to their study, 36 percent of fitness tracker owners in the U.S. market are 35-54 years old, 41 percent had an average income of more than $100,000, and 54 percent were women.

Moreover, one-in-ten U.S. adults now own a fitness tracker.

Smartwatches haven’t caught on as quickly, with only two percent penetration, and appeal to a much different segment of the market.


More than two-thirds (69 percent) of smartwatch owners are 18-34 years old, skew mostly towards the male population (71 percent) and nearly half (48 percent) had an income below $45,000.

"There is no average consumer for the wearables market; the fitness tracker and smartwatch target consumer are fundamentally different,” said Wes Henderek, director connected intelligence at NPD Group.

NPD believes that while they expect smartwatch ownership to grow more rapidly over the next year, there will remain a clear place for the fitness tracker due to its size, battery life, and focus on one specific use case -- as opposed to the smartwatch which is trying to be a little bit of everything for everyone.

The Consumers and Wearables report from NPD is delivered twice a year as part of the Connected Intelligence WEAR practice. The report is based on a survey of 5,000 U.S. consumers, age 18 and older that was completed in December 2014.

This information was then calibrated against life-to-date unit sales of wearable devices from the NPD Retail Tracking Service, as well as Civic Science results relating to wearable device ownership.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...