Skip to main content

VOD Gets Boost from Free Content

Growth in Free-on-Demand (FOD) services and content over the past year has significantly increased overall consumer awareness of and usage of Video-on-Demand (VOD), reports In-Stat. Some leading cable operators like Comcast and Cablevision Systems believe that FOD services are a key differentiator in their battle with Direct Broadcast Satellite services, and they are pressuring content developers to supply them with even more FOD content. "There were approximately 7.5 million worldwide cable-based VOD users at the end of 2004," says Mike Paxton, In-Stat analyst. "VOD user growth is projected to remain strong for the next several years. Total worldwide users are forecasted to rise to almost 13 million at the end of 2005, and ultimately reach 34 million in 2009."

In-Stat's report found the following:

- Based on an end-user survey, 25 percent of all US cable TV subscriber households have tried VOD.
- The "Cost-per-VOD Stream," which measures the total cost of equipment and network operations needed to deliver VOD service to a home, dropped from $300 in mid-2004 to $250 in mid-2005.
- Although the majority of cable VOD service deployments are in North America, during the past year, cable operators in Great Britain, Japan, South Korea, and Israel have launched VOD services.
- Worldwide revenues from cable VOD services totaled $526 million in 2004. While this total was a 55 percent increase over 2003, cable VOD revenues continue to lag user growth as FOD services increase in popularity.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...