Skip to main content

B2B Marketers Move Ad Spending Online

It's not a niche anymore. Nearly half of B2B respondents report that they have used online marketing tactics this year.

"The B2B Digital Marketing Shift" study, conducted for American Business Media (ABM) by Forrester Research, interviewed 867 B2B marketers from a number of industries to gauge their views, and current practices, on brand building, lead generation and market spending. The findings indicate that the online channel is continuing to grow.

First and foremost, B2B marketers feel that industry-specific marketing -- including trade shows, magazines and websites -- are more effective than general magazines or websites. No surprise there, perhaps, but when probed further, the marketers revealed a shift toward digital media, with 49 percent of them currently using that format.

The B2B marketers who are spending at least some of their budgets on the Internet report spending 24 percent of those budgets online. When it comes to the future of B2B marketing, respondents reported that the Web will soon surpass direct mail and general business magazines.

As for which channels were most effective for branding, in-person events, PR and trade magazines lead the way, and respondents felt the Internet was roughly equivalent to TV, general business magazines and newspapers.

When asked which vehicles were most effective for lead generation, in-person events, PR and trade magazines still lead, but the marketers rated online marketing equal to direct marketing and more effective than TV, general business magazines and newspapers.

The B2B marketing spending pie is cut into many pieces, with events, direct mail and trade magazine -- three of the most effective marketing tools as reported by respondents -- only getting 15 percent, 9 percent and 7 percent, respectively. Online and Web accounted for 21 percent.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...