Skip to main content

Eclectic Online Video Finds a Niche

As mainstream broadcasters and cable programmers begin providing well-produced streaming video online, they are going to find they can't just waltz into the broadband space and begin plucking customers immediately. They�ll face real competition from Internet incumbents -- existing online services such as Break.com, AtomFilms.com and Heavy.com -- that owned online video before it was trendy and which have attracted massive, loyal audiences.

Last week, Break.com featured as one of its top videos a minute-long clip of a group of college kids pushing a friend in a shopping cart down the stairwell in their dormitory. Admittedly, it was sophomoric -- a typical college stunt. But it was also pretty funny.

That�s why it�s one of the leading videos on online video channel Break, a Web TV venue that is generating massive traffic to its assortment of user-created videos. Break is on pace to attract nearly 10 million unique monthly visitors watching more than 100 million video clips this month. According to Nielsen/NetRatings, the site generated more than 5 million unique visitors in the first half of November.

That�s about three times Comedy Central's 3.3 million monthly unique visitors. Comedy Central�s newly launched broadband platform, MotherLoad, had close to 50,000 unique visitors the week of Nov. 7. Because Break is focused on comedic short videos, it�s right in the Comedy Central competitive arena. AtomFilms lures between 5 million and 6 million unique visitors monthly.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...