Skip to main content

Ericsson Becomes Mobile Outsourcer

Ericsson and 3 UK announced a seven-year managed services deal through which Ericsson will manage 3�s 3G mobile network and IT infrastructure. This deal is the largest in Ericsson�s history and includes the transfer of 1,000 employees from 3 to Ericsson UK. Specifics as to the exact dollar value of the deal were not provided by the companies involved, though Pyramid Research estimates that the contract value is in excess of $2.5bn.

Since Pyramid Research began analyzing the managed services and outsourcing market four years ago, their analysts have predicted that larger-scale, more ambitious deals such as this would become the norm. Pyramid Research�s Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau explains, �Operators in an increasingly competitive industry are struggling to manage their network costs and quickly launch new, revenue-generating services and technology solutions. Through outsourcing, carriers are able to focus on increasing the bottom line.�

By partnering with their vendor suppliers, operators are able to reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by as much as 20 percent, largely through a reduction in network OPEX, while relying on vendors like Ericsson, Lucent, Motorola, and others to manage their network operations and performance. This kind of strategic outsourcing frees up the operator to focus its remaining resources on product development, customer acquisition and retention, and other initiatives that will drive revenue growth.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...