Skip to main content

US Cable TV Companies Raise Rates

The nation's biggest cable companies are boosting their rates by single-digit percentages, citing rising costs for programming and investment in new services.

Industry leader Comcast Corporation is raising the rate on its most popular cable package by an average of 6 percent next year in all markets, while number two Time Warner Cable customers are being asked to pay an average 3.1 percent more for its expanded basic package and 1.9 percent more for its limited basic plan.

The cost for Philadelphia-based Comcast's expanded basic package will rise to an average of about $47.70 as early as January 1, the company said. Nearly all the company's 21.4 million cable subscribers nationwide will see an increase, since the expanded basic plan is the building block upon which digital services are added.

Cable TV rates have clearly risen dramatically since the FCC was ordered to discontinue regulating the industry on March 31, 1999.

As required by Congress in the 1996 Telecommunications Act, after that date, the Commission was told not to accept and process consumer complaints about rates. The FCC had previously resolved more than 18,000 complaints involving more than 5700 cable communities. The Commission had also ordered nearly $100 million in consumer refunds during the nearly six years of cable rate regulation to 40 million cable TV consumers.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...