Skip to main content

U.S. Film Industry in Turmoil During 2005

"Good Riddance '05, Hollywood's Annus Horribilis" -- that's the bleak headline of the Hollywood Reporter's annual assessment of the U.S. film industry -- Looking back at Hollywood in 2005 it's hard not to say Good Riddance and assess it as Elizabeth II did when she called 1992 an Annus Horribilis after fire nearly destroyed Windsor Castle and scandals rocked the Royal Family.

The past year was marked by an almost unending boxoffice slump reflecting not only under-performing movies, but major changes in how Americans seem to feel about movies and moviegoing. 2005 has to have been one of the most stressful periods in modern Hollywood history.

Many factors contributed to this, including, of course, the quality -- or, perhaps, the lack of quality -- of many of the films that went into release last year. To some extent, it would be more comforting if it was only a question of quality because then it would be a temporary aberration that could be corrected by green lighting different kinds of projects. Unfortunately, there's a long list of troubling factors that also have to be considered as part of the overall malaise Hollywood found itself suffering from in 2005.

In no particular order, these include such things as movie admissions declining, ticket prices rising, video piracy soaring, production costs running wild, stars behaving badly, young male audiences eroding, guild leaderships turning militant, the DVD business maturing, network TV shares falling, marketing expenses escalating, in-theater commercials proliferating, video on demand growing, gasoline prices reducing non-essential driving, mini-majors falling by the wayside, home theaters becoming more affordable and new entertainment opportunities springing up through the Internet, iPods, Xboxes, SlingBoxes and mobile phones.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Every Tech Vendor Needs a Real AI Story

Every product roadmap conversation with a technology vendor now runs through one filter that has nothing to do with the roadmap itself: does the company have an AI story that a buyer's finance team would actually underwrite. Forrester Research just gave that gut check a formal structure. Its newly introduced AI Disruption Model evaluates 17 technology and service categories, spanning more than 200 individual markets, against nine factors including AI substitutability, labor intensity, and switching costs. The finding that should reorder tech vendor strategy conversations this quarter is not which markets grow. It is how few of them do, and what that scarcity means for everyone else. Only Three Categories Get an Unambiguous Green Light According to the research, infrastructure providers such as cloud platforms, data centers, and storage; data and AI providers spanning models, platforms, and governance tooling; and cybersecurity and identity providers covering zero trust and AI agent...