Skip to main content

U.S. Telco A-la-carte TV for Franchise Relief

Top telephone company executives asked the U.S. Congress to streamline cable-franchising rules during a Senate Commerce Committee hearing, engendering some sympathy from the panel.

�I believe the franchising process needs to be looked at, needs to be streamlined,� said Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), a moderate making a point supported by several committee senators from both parties. �The time for a national, streamlined franchising process is now because the era of broadband video is here,� said Verizon Communications Inc. CEO Ivan Seidenberg, who accused cable of �sending their lawyers to impose on Verizon a laundry list of onerous obligations.�

The franchising ruckus prompted Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to begin work on a bill that would eliminate local entry barriers if providers offered a menu of a la carte programming in conjunction with traditional programming packages. AT&T Inc. has promised a la carte offerings if allowed to by content vendors.

�I don�t see why a retired person in Sun City, Ariz., should have to pay an exorbitant fee to watch ESPN,� said McCain, adding that his bill would emerge �soon.�

Commerce Committee chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) wants to vote on a bill in March. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va.) said he thinks legislation has a chance because he and other lawmakers want companies to spend billions of dollars to deploy broadband facilities in rural states if provided the right incentives.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...