Skip to main content

HDTV Global Uptake and Assessment

Screen Digest has analyzed the business of high definition television worldwide. The top 19 television markets are reviewed in Western Europe, North America, and the Asia Pacific region. Their report encompasses all business models, all delivery platforms (DTH, DTT, cable, IPTV), and reveals the key opportunities and challenges for broadcasters and other industry players right throughout the value chain.

Key findings of the report:

High definition television has reached a tipping point in 2005/06. In North America and Asia-Pacific, after four to seven years of implementation but slow penetration, HDTV is now set for mass market take off. In Europe, after pioneering services and trials over the last two years, many launches and massive marketing of HDTV services will take place over the next 12 months.

At the end of 2005 there were 34 million households in Western Europe, USA and Asia-Pacific with an HD resolution TV set out of 719 million TV households (ie, four percent). There were almost 4 million of them in Western Europe, of which 2 million could be qualified as fully 'HD ready'.

At year end, only 12 million households were actually able to watch HDTV broadcasts on their HD ready sets, predominantly U.S. households. By 2010, HD watching households will grow to 105 million (13 percent of all TV households), with the highest penetration in the US and Japan. In Western Europe, we forecast penetration to be seven percent (12 million), of which 9 million will receive HDTV through pay TV, and an additional 3 million through free-to-air broadcasting.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...