Skip to main content

Movie Theaters Profit from Food, Drink, Ads

While Hollywood is suffering from a box office slump and rapid de-acceleration of video growth, the movie theater business is holding up well despite travails for its suppliers. However, the latest market research indicates that U.S. theater-owner profit has little to do with the sale of movie tickets to consumers.

Kagan Research calculates that cash flow margins for leading theater circuits was a healthy 17.6 percent for the first nine months of 2005. With publicly-traded theater companies still to announce full financials for 2005, the nine-month data through September is the most recent period available.

The 17.6 percent cash flow figure�good for a mature business like exhibition � is better than the 15 percent generated by Hollywood film distributors, although less than cable TV, broadcasters and cell phone operators that top 30 percent, according Kagan data. Cash flow is an indicator of core profitability.

Kagan Research senior analyst Wade Holden says theaters augmented box office revenue with higher takes from sale of food/beverages (also called concessions) and on-screen advertising. For example, the largest U.S. circuit Regal Cinemas � with 6,537 screens � posted a $15.3 million revenue increase in the first nine months of 2005 from food/beverages and $13.1 million more revenue from �other� operations � mainly screen advertising before the featured movie starts.

Historically, theaters earn about three quarters of their profits from the one quarter of their revenue that comes primarily from the high-priced junk food and carbonated beverages they sell -- and to a lesser extent the on-screen advertising. Therefore, the theater business model has apparently moved away from being entertainment-centric, and become more like a typical convenience store.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...