Skip to main content

They're Not Movies, They're Content

Shelly Palmer describes why Hollywood's major studios are really in decline -- hint, it's not the consumer's fault. Palmer is currently the Chairman of The Advanced Media Committee (and 1st Vice President of the New York Chapter) of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (NATAS) the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy Awards.

"Now, the industry is run by bankers and risk managers who are trying to maximize their investments. They don't make many films that interest me. I like films that tell stories, have beginnings, middles and endings and that take me someplace or that make me think. Hollywood refers to them as "little films." Little films are being made by independent filmmakers and the pundits say that those are the films that this year's Academy voters responded to. Maybe. It is also possible that no major studio made a blockbuster film worth watching this year. Was there one? Not a sequel, not a remake, something new and wonderful that captured the imagination and broke new ground... nope. Not this year.

As we enter the age of ubiquitous broadband video distribution, we will have more and more opportunities to watch content that we are individually interested in. Personalized video experiences are the natural evolution of our current technology. We have enjoyed personal music for decades; portable and personal video is not next, it's now.

The film industry can do as many commercials as it wants for the "big screen" experience. Home theaters, Video iPods, IP Video, DVDs, video-on-demand and other programming choices must be incorporated into Hollywood's business models if they are to prosper during this technological transition. Will they be able to make a profit creating and distributing "little" films? Can a blockbuster truly prosper in a file-sharing world?

Was this just a bad year creatively and part of the normal cycle of hits and flops, or is this year truly the portent of a downward trend? These are questions that smart movie executives should be asking themselves. The answer is not old clips and admonitions about the diminished value of movies on alternative platforms. Thinking small and asking people to look backwards to a simpler time just shines a very bright klieg light on tired old hands grasping at the past. Hey, Hollywood, they're not movies -- they're content!"

Popular posts from this blog

Product Design AI to Reach $4.3 Billion by 2035

Artificial intelligence tools for product design have largely been sold to engineering leaders as a productivity story: faster renders, quicker iterations, fewer manual CAD operations. According to the latest market study by ABI Research, the market for artificial intelligence in product design is set to grow from $628 million in 2025 to $4.3 billion by 2035; that's a 21.3 percent compound annual growth rate. The trajectory reflects a market moving past assistive tools and into a phase where AI becomes structurally embedded in how products get engineered, simulated, and validated. For executives overseeing engineering, product development, and R&D organizations, this is no longer a tooling decision. It is a competitive positioning decision, and the window to shape it is narrower than most roadmaps assume. The Ten-Year Growth Outlook Mechanical product design and simulation is the AI beachhead within manufacturing. A full 62 percent of manufacturers are already running AI projec...