Skip to main content

Process for Predicting Technology Success

According to Forrester Research, companies are constantly launching new products that they hope will strike a chord with consumers. But how did Apple's iPod hit it big while WebTV and the tablet PC failed to catch on with mainstream consumers?

The answer lies in our new report, "TechPotential: Predicting Technology Success." Their research concludes that success or failure rests on a simple truth: Consumers adopt products when they can easily identify the benefits of those products and when they believe those benefits are worth the effort and cost (investment in time, energy and money).

TechPotential is a tool that Forrester has developed to forecast sales of new consumer technology products and services. It evaluates three aspects of a product's launch -- consumer demand, usability and design, and marketing execution -- to project five-year unit sales of new products. The growth curve is driven by three factors:

-Consumer Demand -- which is determined by the consumer's negotiation of the cost and benefits of the product, dictates the potential five-year growth of a product by identifying a universe of possible consumers, analyzing comparable products, and estimating potential consumer demand.

-Usability -- rating a product's design and usability based on four criteria: 1) consumer first impression; 2) installation; 3) first use; and 4) long-term value. Usability can drive word of mouth for a new product and determines how fast a product can grow.

-Execution -- assessing the producer's ability to effectively market and distribute the product and to forge partnerships that will benefit the product's uptake. These marketing factors can slow or quicken the pace at which a new product sells, especially in the first year.

TechPotential is designed to reveal not just which products will succeed but also why -- and how to redirect strategy to maximize that success.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...