Skip to main content

SMS Messaging Still Key to Mobile Data

At a time when operators are heavily focusing on rolling out data applications and offering a wide range of content, their bread and butter still lies with SMS.

According to a recent IDC study, the mobile messaging market in Western Europe, which includes SMS, MMS, and MIM, will be worth more than $15.4 billion in 2010. "Mobile messaging will continue to play a key role in the industry for many companies, not just mobile operators," said Paolo Pescatore, research manager for IDC�s European Wireless and Mobile Communications service.

Pescatore believes that each of the three services addressed in the study serve a specific and different purpose and operators need to find out how best to serve their target markets. If not, they may lose out on any opportunities to third-party companies.

Within the MMS opportunity, simple services from MMS postcards to new ways of sharing such as MMS online photo albums, which operators are not doing enough to promote, could be of high value to users.

Clearly, SMS generates the greatest amount of end-user spending, and this will continue throughout the forecast period. The situation is quite different regarding MMS, for which usage is relatively unpredictable. During the forecast period, usage does increase, but users have not realized the value it can bring to them. The MIM market is still fragmented, and IDC believes the true value to users will be presence.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intr...