Skip to main content

Best Buy In-Store Experience Development

Business 2.0 reports that Best Buy may seem to be in an enviable position. The Minneapolis-based company's 800 stores account for 17 percent of the retail electronics business in the United States, and its share price rose 10-fold during the past decade.

But keeping up that kind of growth is tough - especially when many younger, savvier customers are spurning the limited selection, bland decor, and sales tax of big-box retailers for cheaper, hipper online outlets.

Now Best Buy is opening experimental stores focused on desirable niches. Soccer moms, for example, get 'Studio D' in the Chicago suburb of Naperville, with personal shoppers and classes in how to use a digital camera.

The young gadget geeks at the top of Best Buy's must-have customer list get 'Escape,' in Chicago's swanky Lincoln Park neighborhood. Designed to look like a nightclub, Escape offers brand-new products that other Best Buys don't carry, as well as a snack bar and videogame-testing rooms with comfy couches and high-end TVs that are rented out by the hour.

The company doesn't know yet if Escape is an experiment worth repeating. "To understand a market, you need to have something out there for two or three years to see if it could be sustainable and profitable," says James Damian, senior vice president of Best Buy's experience development group. "It's a learn-and-earn model."

I commend Best Buy on two fronts -- first, for creating an 'experience development' group, and second for attempting creative in-store consumer engagement models.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...