Skip to main content

Convergence is About Confusing Technology

International Herald Tribune reports that for European telecommunications companies, marketing used to be fairly simple. Back in the days of state-sponsored monopolies, they didn't really have to do it at all. Then, when telecommunications markets were liberalized, new brands sprang up, each selling a specific service to consumers: Orange or Vodafone became synonymous with mobile networks, Tiscali and Wanadoo with Internet access, for instance.

But now things are more complicated, as telecommunications providers aim to sell a new, less palpable idea called "convergence." This concept took a step forward in France and Britain when a diverse range of France Telecom units, including mobile, broadband Internet and business services, "converged" under the Orange brand name.

Of course, many other operators are piling in with converged offers of their own. From a marketing perspective, convergence might seem like a no-brainer. Instead of forcing consumers to deal with different providers for fixed and mobile calls, broadband access and pay television, it allows them to write one check and deal with one customer-service team for complaints. Yet the selling of convergence has not been as seamless as it might seem.

The biggest problem, analysts say, is that telecommunications executives are mostly programmed to think about technologies, rather than consumer benefits. So when technological options multiply, telecommunication companies see new opportunities, while consumers just see a proliferation of jargon.

"If you're in the industry, you love this kind of thing," said Mike Cansfield, head of telecommunications strategy at Ovum, a consultancy. "But telcos have to learn how to articulate what these things mean and what the benefit is for a consumer - be it at home or in business."

Popular posts from this blog

Why Every Tech Vendor Needs a Real AI Story

Every product roadmap conversation with a technology vendor now runs through one filter that has nothing to do with the roadmap itself: does the company have an AI story that a buyer's finance team would actually underwrite. Forrester Research just gave that gut check a formal structure. Its newly introduced AI Disruption Model evaluates 17 technology and service categories, spanning more than 200 individual markets, against nine factors including AI substitutability, labor intensity, and switching costs. The finding that should reorder tech vendor strategy conversations this quarter is not which markets grow. It is how few of them do, and what that scarcity means for everyone else. Only Three Categories Get an Unambiguous Green Light According to the research, infrastructure providers such as cloud platforms, data centers, and storage; data and AI providers spanning models, platforms, and governance tooling; and cybersecurity and identity providers covering zero trust and AI agent...