Skip to main content

Convergence is About Confusing Technology

International Herald Tribune reports that for European telecommunications companies, marketing used to be fairly simple. Back in the days of state-sponsored monopolies, they didn't really have to do it at all. Then, when telecommunications markets were liberalized, new brands sprang up, each selling a specific service to consumers: Orange or Vodafone became synonymous with mobile networks, Tiscali and Wanadoo with Internet access, for instance.

But now things are more complicated, as telecommunications providers aim to sell a new, less palpable idea called "convergence." This concept took a step forward in France and Britain when a diverse range of France Telecom units, including mobile, broadband Internet and business services, "converged" under the Orange brand name.

Of course, many other operators are piling in with converged offers of their own. From a marketing perspective, convergence might seem like a no-brainer. Instead of forcing consumers to deal with different providers for fixed and mobile calls, broadband access and pay television, it allows them to write one check and deal with one customer-service team for complaints. Yet the selling of convergence has not been as seamless as it might seem.

The biggest problem, analysts say, is that telecommunications executives are mostly programmed to think about technologies, rather than consumer benefits. So when technological options multiply, telecommunication companies see new opportunities, while consumers just see a proliferation of jargon.

"If you're in the industry, you love this kind of thing," said Mike Cansfield, head of telecommunications strategy at Ovum, a consultancy. "But telcos have to learn how to articulate what these things mean and what the benefit is for a consumer - be it at home or in business."

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...