Skip to main content

Growth of Linux-Based Consumer Electronics

CRN reports that over the past six months, nearly every major consumer electronics (CE) vendor has developed plans to create home products running Linux to ensure product innovation and prevent another Microsoft market monopoly. At the same time, digital integrators are developing their own Linux-based home solutions, which often lead to higher margins and significant savings for their customers.

"Other operating systems are many hundreds of dollars more expensive, plus you have the incremental costs when new versions come out, and you have maintenance fees," says Ken Fuhrman, president of Westminster, Colorado-based Interact-TV, which makes the Linux-based Telly line of home entertainment servers. "Linux will have a much lower cost in the long term."

Linux also frees vendors and integrators from the reign of any single software vendor. "Fundamentally, having choice is a very attractive business proposition," says Scott Smyers, vice president of the Network and Systems Architecture Division at Sony Electronics and president of the steering committee of the Consumer Electronics Linux Forum (CELF), a consortium founded about a year ago to create a common standard of Linux requirements for CE devices. CELF now has more than 75 members, including Sony, Toshiba, Samsung Electronics, Royal Philips Electronics, Hewlett-Packard, Panasonic, Hitachi, NEC and IBM.

This platform-agnostic approach can ease CE device development and provide cost savings. Manufacturers and integrators have a wide pool of tools and software at their fingertips, as opposed to relying on support from vendors peddling a proprietary OS. Plus, it's easy to find developers to assist in particular projects. Linux supporters also point to its security, stability and networking strengths, which are important for always-on, networked CE devices.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...