Skip to main content

How Intel Mismanaged its Mobile Chip Unit

Forbes reports that financial analysts have always assumed that Intel's cell phone related division has been a money pit. Now the company has proved them correct, dumping the unit to Marvell Technology for the fire-sale price of $600 million.

The deal comes after the company invested nine years and likely more than $3 billion into cracking the billion-unit market for its cell phone division. It ultimately accomplished little more than illustrating how difficult it was for the chip giant to stray from its core business.

In 1997, after an ugly lawsuit, Intel bought the chip unit of Digital Equipment for $700 million, which included a small microprocessor chip that fits inside cell phones and other smaller electronics. Two years later, the company paid another $1.6 billion for an Israeli cell phone-chip company called DSP Communications.

But the company never won big chunks of business from the behemoth cell phone makers like Motorola, Nokia or Samsung. Those companies each ship hundreds of millions of units per year, but they have loyal suppliers like Freescale Semiconductor, Texas Instruments and Qualcomm that were not easy to displace.

But Intel continued to pour money into the business. In a Marvell conference call, it was clear how bloated the Intel division had become. It has 1,400 employees but annual sales of only $400 million. While Marvell officials didn't spell out how much money the unit was losing, they did say the deal would depress their earnings for the next year.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...