Skip to main content

How Intel Mismanaged its Mobile Chip Unit

Forbes reports that financial analysts have always assumed that Intel's cell phone related division has been a money pit. Now the company has proved them correct, dumping the unit to Marvell Technology for the fire-sale price of $600 million.

The deal comes after the company invested nine years and likely more than $3 billion into cracking the billion-unit market for its cell phone division. It ultimately accomplished little more than illustrating how difficult it was for the chip giant to stray from its core business.

In 1997, after an ugly lawsuit, Intel bought the chip unit of Digital Equipment for $700 million, which included a small microprocessor chip that fits inside cell phones and other smaller electronics. Two years later, the company paid another $1.6 billion for an Israeli cell phone-chip company called DSP Communications.

But the company never won big chunks of business from the behemoth cell phone makers like Motorola, Nokia or Samsung. Those companies each ship hundreds of millions of units per year, but they have loyal suppliers like Freescale Semiconductor, Texas Instruments and Qualcomm that were not easy to displace.

But Intel continued to pour money into the business. In a Marvell conference call, it was clear how bloated the Intel division had become. It has 1,400 employees but annual sales of only $400 million. While Marvell officials didn't spell out how much money the unit was losing, they did say the deal would depress their earnings for the next year.

Popular posts from this blog

AI Agents Have Memory. Where is The Security?

Enterprise AI adoption keeps running into the same wall: the moment sensitive data, model weights, or agent memory leave a tightly controlled environment, security teams lose visibility into what happens to them while the workload is actually running. Confidential computing exists to close that gap, and new research from ABI Research shows the technology has matured enough, across CPUs, GPUs, containers, and now agentic AI, to become a foundational requirement for enterprises building sovereign AI infrastructure: computing environments they control end to end rather than simply rent. Protection is Moving From CPUs to GPUs ABI Research finds that CPU-based confidential computing is closest to mass-market adoption, the product of years spent hardening chip-level isolation for general workloads. GPU-based confidential computing is now generating the strongest momentum, and for good reason. It addresses one of the largest unresolved gaps in AI security: protecting data and models while inf...