Skip to main content

U.S. Broadband Consumer Spending Forecast

According to Yankee Group research, as large U.S. telcos start to deploy television services, following on the heels of cable telephony deployments, the market for service providers will enter a new phase of competition. Telcos face line losses driven by wireless substitution, cable telephony and internet-based VoIP providers.

Similarly, cable operators are competing in a mature pay-TV market without significant potential for new growth, while satellite attacks their existing subscriber base. Even satellite operators have seen a slowdown in net new subscriber additions in the last few quarters.

As traditional voice and traditional cable providers encroach on each other�s territory, developing an effective bundling strategy has become more critical. When consumers adopt multiple products from the same provider, the service provider yields several benefits, including an additional revenue stream, reduced churn and a better ability to price their product competitively. As consumer awareness and service providers� focus increases, bundle momentum will grow.

In January 2006, Yankee Group began an assessment of the opportunity market for broadband service providers. For the purpose of the study, they defined a broadband service provider as a company delivering high-speed data (HSD) service, local telephone service or subscription television. The study took an in-depth look at the effect of the bundle as well as shifts in churn metrics and traditional service adoption dynamics.

Based on this study, Yankee Group estimates the broadband service spending of 32 million to 35 million households will be in play every year for the next 3 years. The average spending over the subscription lifetime of each of these households will be between $3,854 and $4,481. At the same time, the revenue opportunity these household service decisions represent will grow from $137.5 billion in 2006 to $145.3 billion in 2009.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...