Skip to main content

U.S. Broadband Consumer Spending Forecast

According to Yankee Group research, as large U.S. telcos start to deploy television services, following on the heels of cable telephony deployments, the market for service providers will enter a new phase of competition. Telcos face line losses driven by wireless substitution, cable telephony and internet-based VoIP providers.

Similarly, cable operators are competing in a mature pay-TV market without significant potential for new growth, while satellite attacks their existing subscriber base. Even satellite operators have seen a slowdown in net new subscriber additions in the last few quarters.

As traditional voice and traditional cable providers encroach on each other�s territory, developing an effective bundling strategy has become more critical. When consumers adopt multiple products from the same provider, the service provider yields several benefits, including an additional revenue stream, reduced churn and a better ability to price their product competitively. As consumer awareness and service providers� focus increases, bundle momentum will grow.

In January 2006, Yankee Group began an assessment of the opportunity market for broadband service providers. For the purpose of the study, they defined a broadband service provider as a company delivering high-speed data (HSD) service, local telephone service or subscription television. The study took an in-depth look at the effect of the bundle as well as shifts in churn metrics and traditional service adoption dynamics.

Based on this study, Yankee Group estimates the broadband service spending of 32 million to 35 million households will be in play every year for the next 3 years. The average spending over the subscription lifetime of each of these households will be between $3,854 and $4,481. At the same time, the revenue opportunity these household service decisions represent will grow from $137.5 billion in 2006 to $145.3 billion in 2009.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Every Tech Vendor Needs a Real AI Story

Every product roadmap conversation with a technology vendor now runs through one filter that has nothing to do with the roadmap itself: does the company have an AI story that a buyer's finance team would actually underwrite. Forrester Research just gave that gut check a formal structure. Its newly introduced AI Disruption Model evaluates 17 technology and service categories, spanning more than 200 individual markets, against nine factors including AI substitutability, labor intensity, and switching costs. The finding that should reorder tech vendor strategy conversations this quarter is not which markets grow. It is how few of them do, and what that scarcity means for everyone else. Only Three Categories Get an Unambiguous Green Light According to the research, infrastructure providers such as cloud platforms, data centers, and storage; data and AI providers spanning models, platforms, and governance tooling; and cybersecurity and identity providers covering zero trust and AI agent...