Skip to main content

Blur Between Entertainment, Communications

The Hollywood Reporter has an insightful editorial by Andrew Wallenstein entitled "Mixing Media" that features how giant cable companies are duking it out with the nation's telcos to see who can provide the most comprehensive phone, broadband, video and mobile services to tech-savvy consumers.

Within the column, several industry analysts share their best estimates regarding the end-of-year telco IPTV penetration in the U.S. market. The results are very low -- with one predicting that telcos are projected to have far fewer than 1 percent of TV subscribers by year's end, and only 6 percent by 2009.

But the real action is still to come. What is known as a bundle today will seem primitive in a few years, when companies will combine not only the billing for multiple services but also the services themselves.

The Bells and Big Cable are intent on integrating the computer, phone and television in ways that will blur the boundary between entertainment and communications. That means customers won't simply watch their favorite TV channels on their mobile phones; soon enough, they'll be answering their phones through their TV sets.

"For a long time, the triple play of voice, video and data was going to be enough," says Matthew Davis, program director of consumer multiplay services at research firm IDC. "The problem is that the world is changing so fast that there's new complexities coming into it."

The implications of the quadruple play are not only being felt in the U.S. but also taking various shapes in Europe at such companies as France Telecom, which is marketing all four services under the Orange brand, and British cable provider NTL, which is expected to follow suit once its acquisition of Virgin Mobile is complete.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...