Skip to main content

Limitations of Broadband Service Bundling

Ken Pyle, analyst of the U.S. independent telco market and Managing Editor, Viodi View, has a new commentary entitled "Will the Bundle Be Enough?" -- insights include the following key points.
Mitch Clark, Executive Vice President of Marketing Operations for UPC Broadband, suggested that successful bundles target lifestyles and give customers choice. At the same time, operators must communicate the benefits and value of the offering in simple terms; in the language of their customers. Clark suggested that simplicity goes beyond communication and includes the ability for customers to self-provision services and having monitoring systems that indicate to customer service representatives the types of services a customer has and what they might want.

Ultimately, the bundle will not be enough for an independent telco to remain competitive. The key to future competitiveness will be able to continually add value to the bundle with the addition of new features that are well communicated to the customer base and that are competitively priced. These things, coupled with an independent telco's exemplary local service, will allow an independent telco to maintain a competitive edge in today's bundled world.

When the current mania for multi-play bundling declines, then we can have a meaningful dialogue about the challenges of being a broadband service provider in a sea of bundled sameness.

Technology-centered and even the more evolved product-centered service providers naturally gravitate towards multi-play bundling, because it gives them yet another opportunity to focus on themselves -- instead of their customers. The attraction is too compelling for them to resist.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...