Skip to main content

STB Remote Control Designs Getting Better


Informitv reports that UK satellite broadcaster Sky has launched a new remote control specifically designed to assist older customers, people with visual impairments and those with limited dexterity. The market introduction demonstrates the importance of accessibility in the design of television related products and services.

The new 'Easy Grip' remote device is similar to the usual Sky+ remote control but comes in two styles with either a textured easy grip or a hand strap to assist those with limited dexterity. Both versions have larger numerals, text and graphics with raised contoured buttons and increased color contrast.

The development of the inclusive remote control was shaped by research conducted by Sky in association with disability groups and Age Concern. It is designed to meet the needs of customers with both minor impediments and a range of disabilities including motor control and cognitive impairment.

As you may recall, I have previously commented on the apparent lack of creative designs that incorporate enhanced ease-of-use for set top boxes and associated remote controls.

My prior commentary regarding the MatrixStream design clearly makes this unique device one of the few exceptions to the rule. IMHO, the Sky remote control design still has way too many buttons, which is probably due to limitations imposed by the STB's feature menus and the electronic program guide.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...