Skip to main content

VOD Usage Shows Maturity and Fluctuations

Per capita usage of video on demand (VOD) seems to be showing seasonal fluctuations at U.S. cable TV giant Comcast, indicating a degree of maturity that may pop up in broader VOD consumption trends.

Comcast subscribers generated a peak of 44.5 VOD views in Q4 2005 (or 14.8 views per month) and then usage slid to 42.8 VOD views in spring-to-summer Q2 2006, according to analysis by Kagan Research. A view consists of a request for a discrete item of on-demand content.

At the same time, the underlying pool of VOD subscribers keeps enlarging, making VOD a solid growth sector. Comcast's count of VOD enabled subs grew from 7.5 million in Q1 2005 to 10.0 million by Q2 2006. The growing pool drove up Comcast's total VOD views from 278 million in Q1 2005 to 420 million in Q2 2006.

Comcast had 22.4 million total subscribers at end 2005—both digital and analog. Per-capita consumption could climb again if consumers warm to specific programming.
Comcast, among the most aggressive cable system operators deploying VOD, maintains a 95:5 split between free and pay movie views. That means 95 percent of movie views are library titles available at no extra charge in a free or subscription VOD (SVOD) window—offering unlimited usage from a pool of titles.

Comcast says its VOD program pool has 7,000 titles each month that subscriber can pause, rewind or fast-forward. Thus, VOD is mostly a consumer satisfaction tool designed to reduce subscriber churn, rather than run up revenue with per view fees.

Kagan Research estimates the entire cable industry pulled in nearly $1.3 billion from all types of on demand programming, including erotic fare. Cable offers on demand programming on a pay-per-view, near-VOD (NVOD), VOD and SVOD basis.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...