Skip to main content

Cable MSOs Broaden Revenue Diversification


Cable TV's penetration rate is expected to erode ever so slightly in the next decade -- as the telcos join satellite TV in a dog fight for basic subscribers -- but Kagan Research believes that cable MSOs will still prosper. Cable is adding new revenue streams that will keep it a healthy growth business.

Kagan estimates cable residential revenue -- forecast to be $68.2 billion in 2006 -- will reach $120 billion by 2016. That doesn't include additional revenue from business customers. The gains are expected despite penetration for cable TV video services as a percentage of all residential TV households slipping slightly from 58.6 percent this year.

Cable telephony and high-speed cable modems get the most attention among add-on cable services. But the list is much longer: digital video recorders, high definition channels, video on demand and interactive TV.

"Cable thrived despite stiff competition from satellite TV for a decade," notes Robin Flynn, senior analyst with Kagan Research. "Now telcos have arrived too, but cable is bulked up and remains well positioned. Competition increases, but so does the revenue pie with these additional services."

Ms. Flynn predicts that average revenue per (cable subscriber) unit including all services is expected to climb from $87.04 per month in 2006 to well over $140 by 2016. I believe that this assessment is very optimistic. I'm guessing that she has not taken into consideration any losses associated with the continued growth of over-the-top video distribution services.

Moreover, armed with an IPTV service that closely follows the legacy programming model of the incumbent pay-TV providers, the telcos will have little choice but to ignite a new round of price wars -- in order to attract and retain subscribers beyond the first wave of early adopters. Again, this is not a 'business as usual' scenario.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Every Tech Vendor Needs a Real AI Story

Every product roadmap conversation with a technology vendor now runs through one filter that has nothing to do with the roadmap itself: does the company have an AI story that a buyer's finance team would actually underwrite. Forrester Research just gave that gut check a formal structure. Its newly introduced AI Disruption Model evaluates 17 technology and service categories, spanning more than 200 individual markets, against nine factors including AI substitutability, labor intensity, and switching costs. The finding that should reorder tech vendor strategy conversations this quarter is not which markets grow. It is how few of them do, and what that scarcity means for everyone else. Only Three Categories Get an Unambiguous Green Light According to the research, infrastructure providers such as cloud platforms, data centers, and storage; data and AI providers spanning models, platforms, and governance tooling; and cybersecurity and identity providers covering zero trust and AI agent...