Skip to main content

Broadband Infrastructure Cost Comparisons

As U.S. telcos embark on infrastructure upgrades, they face a delicate balancing act -- weighing the benefits of new technology vs. costs. Kagan Research estimates that installing fiber-to-the-home in 2006 costs $1,650 per household connected.

Among the telcos, Verizon is plunging into FTTH, planning to invest $20 billion in capital expenditures to rewire 16 million households by the end of the decade. In comparison, upgrading MSO cable's hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) networks costs just $470 per household connected in 2006. An in-between infrastructure of fiber-to-the-node costs about $600 per connected household and is used by other telcos, such as AT&T.

On the same network HFC mixes fiber optics for main lines emanating from the cable system's headend and coaxial cable for the numerous final connections to consumer homes. FTTN mixes fiber trunk lines to collection nodes from which copper wires emanate to connect to homes.

Telcos are currently engaged in the labor-intensive process of replacing existing copper with fiber. FTTH wins bragging rights for top data delivery speeds, currently advertising download speeds of 30Mbps and more. Cable systems that rely on HFC can match the throughput -- but more commonly offer between 3Mbps-10Mbps.

Still, Kagan Research senior analyst Ian Olgeirson believes the cable MSO less expensive HFC upgrades are sufficient to satisfy needs for most consumers in the foreseeable future. Kagan estimates 88 percent of cable TV homes passed at end of this year will be upgraded to greater than 750 MHz to provide cable's best performance.

Note, both the fiber and HFC estimates cover equipment and installation expenses to deliver broadband wireline telecommunications, including the "drop cable" that is the final connection to the consumer's home.

Popular posts from this blog

AI Agents Have Memory. Where is The Security?

Enterprise AI adoption keeps running into the same wall: the moment sensitive data, model weights, or agent memory leave a tightly controlled environment, security teams lose visibility into what happens to them while the workload is actually running. Confidential computing exists to close that gap, and new research from ABI Research shows the technology has matured enough, across CPUs, GPUs, containers, and now agentic AI, to become a foundational requirement for enterprises building sovereign AI infrastructure: computing environments they control end to end rather than simply rent. Protection is Moving From CPUs to GPUs ABI Research finds that CPU-based confidential computing is closest to mass-market adoption, the product of years spent hardening chip-level isolation for general workloads. GPU-based confidential computing is now generating the strongest momentum, and for good reason. It addresses one of the largest unresolved gaps in AI security: protecting data and models while inf...