Skip to main content

Newspapers Suffer from Mass-Market Myopia

According to MarketWatch, Tribune Co., New York Times Co. and Dow Jones & Co. are among the newspaper publishers expected to report a decline in third-quarter earnings due to ongoing weakness across several key advertising categories.

Ad sales are lackluster at many U.S. newspapers, as advertisers look at dropping circulation numbers and assume that they won't reach as many of the consumers they desire through print newspapers. Circulation is being affected by a migration of readers to the Web, as well as the impact of the Do Not Call Registry, which has all but taken away one of the industry's prime methods to recruit new subscribers.

This week, Gannett Co. and Media General Inc. reported disappointing third-quarter results, and September results at the newspapers offered little hope for improvement in the fourth quarter. On Tuesday, E.W. Scripps Co. announces quarterly results. The newspaper publisher has fared better than many of its peers because its cable networks, including Food Network and HGTV, have found significant 'niche audiences' that have kept ratings and ad sales strong.

Scripps cable network executives apparently know something about what their targeted audience needs, wants, and desires. Does any major-market newspaper have that same perspective, or anything that's even close? It's unlikely, because the notion of 'anonymous consumers' has always been at the heart of a traditional newspaper's 19th century mass-market thinking. The editorial elite choose what is deemed newsworthy, and then the publication is fed to the 'common people' within the populace.

In hindsight, Knight Ridder was probably wise to sell its assets while there were still buyers. After all is said and done, who will acquire Gannett or Media General when their time has come? Regardless, perhaps what the leadership of the newspaper industry really needs now is foresight and imagination, not hindsight and regret.

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...