Skip to main content

Consensus Regarding Online Ad Spending

eMarketer reports that the trend began early last week, when the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) released new data showing that U.S. Internet advertising revenues reached a record $4.2 billion in the third quarter of 2006.

That represents a 35 percent increase over the $3.1 billion figure posted for the third quarter of 2005, and a 2 percent increase over the second-quarter 2006 total of nearly $4.1 billion.

"Interactive advertising, with its eighth consecutive quarter of growth and the largest single quarter ever, is on pace for its biggest year," said David Silverman of PwC. Now Merrill Lynch has raised its estimates.

Merrill Lynch now estimates that U.S. online ad revenue for the first three quarters of 2006 was 35.5 percent more than in the same period in 2005. The firm previously forecast a 31 percent increase.

Merrill Lynch currently expects U.S. online ad spending in the fourth quarter to be 30 percent more than it was in Q4 2005, up from its estimate of 27 percent. For the year, Merrill is projecting 23.3 percent growth in online ad spending -- up slightly from its previous projection of 22.5 percent. Merrill Lynch expects paid search to increase 27 percent next year, and branded ads to grow 21 percent.

Even with the injection of online video ad spending expected in 2007, the firm projects that search will still account for over 42 percent of the online advertising spend, up one percentage point from this year.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...