Skip to main content

Another Setback for U.S. Telecom Competition

Associated Press reports that the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the nation's largest local phone companies in a lawsuit by consumers alleging anti-competitive business practices, and restraint of trade.

The court ruled 7-2 that the suit lacked any specifics in accusing the companies of secretly agreeing not to compete in each other's territories for local telephone and broadband Internet service -- implying that the fact that they clearly do not compete, is pure coincidence.

As unlikely as that may seem, it's still not enough to make a bare assertion of conspiracy, Justice David Souter wrote in the majority opinion. Souter said the complaint alleging restraint of trade "comes up short."

He said the consumers who filed the suit "have not nudged their claims across the line from conceivable to plausible." In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens objected to the lower court's dismissal of the case without requiring a response from the phone companies. Such a response could have included an explanation of the apparent "coincidental agreement" not to compete.

Federal rules, previous rulings and "sound practice mandate that the district court at least require some sort of response," Stevens wrote. The case stems from changes to the telecommunications law in 1996.

The local phone companies were to open their monopoly markets to competition -- which they did somewhat. In return, they were given the opportunity to enter the long-distance business -- which they did fully.

At the time, the four companies controlled more than 90 percent of the market for local phone service. The original defendants were Bell Atlantic Corp., BellSouth Corp., Qwest Communications International Inc., and SBC Communications Inc. The lawsuit was initiated such a long time ago that companies merged, and even changed names as they created still bigger companies that further inhibited telecom competition.

Consumers represented by the plaintiffs' attorneys sued when the companies continuously kept to their own territories -- avoiding direct competition. The consumers also alleged the local phone companies conspired to keep smaller companies from competing successfully in the larger companies' markets.

The Bush administration supported the phone companies, saying the lawsuit "fails to provide concrete notice of the alleged wrongdoing." Those filing such lawsuits, said the Justice Department's solicitor general, need to be able to point to specific allegations of particular jointly attended meetings or to involvement of alleged conspirators in joint activities.

Regardless, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals previously sided with the consumers, concluding those filing the lawsuit had stated "a plausible claim of conspiracy." Meaning, this case was potentially more than just a coincidental agreement not to compete.

Popular posts from this blog

How Cloud Fuels Digital Business Transformation

Across the globe, many CEOs invested in initiatives to expand their digital offerings. User experience enhancements that are enabled by business technology were a priority in many industries. Worldwide end-user spending on public cloud services is forecast to grow 21.7 percent to a total of $597.3 billion in 2023 -- that's up from $491 billion in 2022, according to the latest market study by Gartner. Cloud computing is driving the next phase of digital transformation, as organizations pursue disruption through technologies like generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), Web3, and enterprise Metaverse. Public Cloud Computing Market Development "Hyperscale cloud providers are driving the cloud agenda," said Sid Nag, vice president at Gartner . Organizations view cloud computing as a highly strategic platform for digital transformation initiatives, which requires providers to offer new capabilities as the competition for digital business escalates. "For example, generativ

Digital Talent Demand Exceeds Supply in Asia-Pac

Even the savviest CEO's desire for a digital transformation advantage has to face the global market reality -- there simply isn't enough skilled and experienced talent available to meet demand. According to the latest market study by IDC, around 60-80 percent of Asia-Pacific (AP) organizations find it "difficult" or "extremely difficult" to fill many IT roles -- including cybersecurity, software development, and data insight professionals. Major consequences of the skills shortage are increased workload on remaining digital business and IT employees, increased security risks, and loss of "hard-to-replace" critical transformation knowledge. Digital Business Talent Market Development Although big tech companies' layoffs are making headlines, they are not representative of the overall global marketplace. Ongoing difficulty to fill key practitioner vacancies is still among the top issues faced by leaders across industries. "Skills are difficul

Mobile Device Market Still Awaiting Recovery

The mobile devices market has experienced three years of unpredictable demand. The global pandemic, geopolitical pressures, supply chain issues, and macroeconomic headwinds have hindered the sector's consistent growth potential. This extremely challenging environment has dramatically affected both demand and supply chains. It has led to subsequent inflationary pressures, leading to a worsening global cost of living crisis suppressing growth and confidence in the sector. In tandem, mobile device industry stakeholders have become more cautious triggering market uncertainties. Mobile Device Market Development Operating under such a backdrop, the development of mobile device ecosystems and vendor landscapes have been impacted severely. Many of these market pressures persisted throughout 2022 and now into 2023, borne chiefly by the smartphone market. According to the latest worldwide market study by ABI Research, worldwide smartphone shipments in 2022 declined 9.6 percent Year-over-Year