Skip to main content

Leading VoIP Service Provider is in Japan

Worldwide VoIP service revenue jumped 66 percent to $15.8 billion in 2006 after more than doubling in 2005, and is expected to more than triple by 2010, according to Infonetics Research.

Hosted VoIP services continue to outpace managed IP PBX services by far, with residential services fueling the market, but the business segment is also growing, and will continue to grow.

"Asia Pacific has been leading the VoIP services scene for a couple of years, with Japan's SoftBank pioneering the service and taking a strong lead, but the EMEA and North America regions have gained some ground at the expense of Asia in the last two years. The Latin American & Caribbean region is also posting impressive growth and gaining share," said Stephane Teral, principal analyst at Infonetics Research and lead author of their report.

Other highlights from the report include:

- Worldwide revenue from residential hosted VoIP services jumped 68 percent between 2005 and 2006; managed IP PBX service revenue grew 45 percent.

- The number of worldwide residential/SOHO VoIP subscribers nearly doubled between 2005 and 2006, to 46.5 million -- 46 percent of which are in the Asia-Pacific region.

- 71 percent of worldwide VoIP service revenue came from residential/SOHO customers in 2006, 29 percent from business customers; revenue from both residential and business customers will increase steadily at least through 2010.

- SoftBank is the world's largest VoIP service provider with 18 percent subscriber market share, followed (in order) by NTT, Vonage, France Telecom, and Time Warner Cable.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...