Skip to main content

Downward Spiral Continues for PDA Products

The worldwide handheld PDA device market posted its fifteenth consecutive quarter of decline in shipments -- signaling either vendor intent to scale back production or exit from market entirely, or perhaps both.

According to IDC's Worldwide Handheld QView, vendors shipped 728,894 handheld devices in 3Q 2007, approximately 1.5 percent more than the previous quarter -- but 39.3 percent less from the same quarter a year ago.

"The handheld device market has been under constant pressure, with mobile phones and converged mobile devices appropriating many of the handheld's salient attributes," says Ramon T. Llamas, research analyst with IDC's Mobile Device Technology and Trends team. "Handheld product portfolios have suffered as vendors have reallocated their production resources."

However, the handheld device market may be down, but is not necessarily out. The handheld still has a loyal, if shrinking, following in developed economies, especially among enterprise users.

In emerging markets, the appeal of the handheld devices seems anchored in the fact that, in the absence of a monthly service plan, it has a lower total cost of ownership compared to mobile phones and/or the converged mobile device.

Palm remained the clear leader in the handheld market -- even though it has not launched a new model for over two years. However, over the same period, the company has released nearly a dozen new Treo converged mobile devices. After having retired the Life Drive, Palm is relying on its Z22, TX, and Tungsten E2 handheld devices.

I still use my Dell Axim pocket PC, enabled with wi-fi broadband access, which is now essentially a collectors item -- since the product line was discontinued earlier in the year. I also still prefer to use a basic "no frills" mobile phone, instead of a smartphone.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...