Skip to main content

Big Shift in Mobile Phone Technology Base

ABI Research forecasts global GSM subscriber growth to slow from a year-on-year rate of over 22 percent in 2006/07 to 14 percent in 2008/09 -- mainly due to the increased migration of subscribers to UMTS 3G technologies.

UMTS (including HSDPA) experienced a nearly 83 percent year-on-year growth rate in 2006/07. ABI Research expects global GSM subscriber numbers to show a negative growth rate starting in 2013, as by then GSM will become less attractive compared to the cheaper 3G services; there will also be losses due to the proliferation of mobile WiMAX and 4G networks.

"Within the GSM subscriber population, EDGE is expected to maintain a high growth rate following increased deployments in emerging markets," says Asia-Pacific vice president Jake Saunders.

"Nonetheless, GSM (including EDGE and GPRS) is still expected to have the highest number of subscribers of all mobile technologies, with a 70 percent global market share in 2013 (dropping from 78 percent in 2007.)"

Meanwhile the W-CDMA (including HSDPA and HSPA) global market share is expected to increase from a little over 5 percent in 2007 to nearly 14 percent in 2013.

The CDMAone and iDEN subscriber bases, on the other hand, have been diminishing quickly in the last five years, and by 2010 most subscribers to these technologies will have migrated to either GSM or CDMA2000 networks. CDMA2000 (including EVDO) has not experienced as high growth rates as UMTS.

"The CDMA2000 growth rate is expected to decline," adds research analyst Hwai Lin Khor, "particularly with the increased talk of CDMA2000 operators adopting LTE in their 4G roadmaps. However, ABI Research expects that CDMA2000 technologies, particularly the 450 MHz implementation, will remain attractive for rural coverage due to their wider network range."

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...