Skip to main content

New Web-Based Personal IP Communication

Personal IP communications is the future of real-time communications for the individual user. This market segment is categorized into three areas including Web-based services, portals, and mobile thin-clients.

Together, IDC forecasts these categories will represent more than $5 billion in annual spending in 2012.

At the forefront of the evolution of "voice as an application" are new Web services platforms from vendors like REBTEL or iotum. Voice is becoming embedded in sites, applications, and other services, sometimes by third party developers but also by the original provider.

Web-based personal IP communication comes in many shapes and sizes, ranging from widgets and applications for social networking sites, to Web sites that initiate the bridging of calls.

IP communication clients for devices, like Truphone and TalkPlus, are integral to the growth of personal IP communication services. While some Web-based services offer a mobile solution via bridging capabilities over the cellular network, many thin client services look to provide an end-to-end VoIP experience via the data network. The proliferation of a new category of devices known as MIDs will be dependent on these IP communications clients' voice communications.

Standalone IP communication portals, like Skype and SightSpeed, have become a viable business. Calls between users on a platform are usually free no matter what the revenue structure. Some portals price calls on a per minute basis depending on where the call terminates while others offer a monthly subscription for unlimited minutes.

Similarly, there are portals that rely 100 percent on user-generated revenue and others that rely on a mix of ad-generated revenue and user-generated revenue.

"Funding models to support personal IP communications still remain in flux. Some services are already being offered for free, looking towards advertising to generate revenue. Other players are offering a free basic service and the option of a premium service for a monthly fee," said Rebecca Swensen, research analyst for VoIP Services at IDC.

"Still, it is questionable whether either of these revenue models will be profitable. Will one model become the de facto standard in the next few years or will there continue to be varying revenue models?"

Popular posts from this blog

Chinese AI Models Cut U.S. Lab Share in Half

The trillion-dollar cloud hyperscaler build-out was underwritten by a simple bet: that enterprises would keep paying a premium for Frontier AI compute indefinitely. The latest market data suggests that AI infrastructure investment is being tested faster than anyone budgeted for, and the shift is not a forecast. It already happened. The Market Flipped in a Year Juniper Research reports that American frontier labs -- Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic among them -- previously accounted for roughly 70 percent of the work run through OpenRouter; the open marketplace where developers choose between competing models. Today that share has fallen to around 30 percent. Why? Chinese models are now running for up to 90 percent less than their U.S. counterparts on the OpenRouter platform. It's not a gradual erosion. It is a market share collapse, and it happened inside a single budget cycle. Cheap Wins Volume, Quality Still Commands a Premium The economic picture is not uniformly bearish for Wester...