Skip to main content

Demand for Real Digital Asset Management

Fueled by the unstoppable flow of audio, video, photos, and text being generated or converted in digital formats, the global market for Digital Asset Management (DAM) solutions -- software intended to capture, organize, store and distribute digital content -- is expected to pass the $1 billion mark in 2013.

According to ABI Research industry analyst Zippy Aima, there are a number of forces acting to drive this market to great heights, but DAM also has some significant challenges to overcome.

"Large quantities of digital media content require collaboration across all personnel and departments, from creation to delivery," says Aima. "DAM system ability to enable integration is driving demand."

Until recently, the different operations concerned with rich media content were siloed and isolated. DAM solutions available today can integrate with existing third-party applications and systems, such as ERP and enterprise content management (ECM) applications.

Another factor motivating organizations to implement DAM is the bottom line: such solutions improve operational efficiency and demonstrate a clear ROI. Falling storage costs and ever-increasing bandwidth also mean that digital assets can be moved around with ease, and this capability too demands powerful management tools.

All that aside, there are still issues to be resolved. First among these is a lingering confusion about the very definition of digital asset management. There is still a lack of clarity around defining the system. DAM systems are often confused with ECMs. Currently, DAM is considered to be a subset of ECM.

Other obstacles to DAM adoption include high price -- the average cost of a DAM system is in the range of $100,000 to $150,000 -- and a lack of interest on the part of C-level enterprise executives.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Every Tech Vendor Needs a Real AI Story

Every product roadmap conversation with a technology vendor now runs through one filter that has nothing to do with the roadmap itself: does the company have an AI story that a buyer's finance team would actually underwrite. Forrester Research just gave that gut check a formal structure. Its newly introduced AI Disruption Model evaluates 17 technology and service categories, spanning more than 200 individual markets, against nine factors including AI substitutability, labor intensity, and switching costs. The finding that should reorder tech vendor strategy conversations this quarter is not which markets grow. It is how few of them do, and what that scarcity means for everyone else. Only Three Categories Get an Unambiguous Green Light According to the research, infrastructure providers such as cloud platforms, data centers, and storage; data and AI providers spanning models, platforms, and governance tooling; and cybersecurity and identity providers covering zero trust and AI agent...