Skip to main content

Mobile Broadband Connectivity Evolution

Sprint, the U.S. wireless operator, lowered its mobile broadband prices for using a phone as a modem, but the price for using PC Cards and USB modems are unchanged. Given this change, cellular modem sales are still set to top $22 billion by 2013.

ABI Research principal analyst Dan Shey notes, "Customers want mobile broadband experiences like those provided by their PCs, meaning they want the fastest devices. Phones with at least 3G radios threaten cellular modem sales; however shipments of these modems will not exceed 30 percent of cellular handset shipments by 2011."

But to truly understand this threat, we must analyze regional penetration of 3G devices. Industrialized countries will see deeper penetration of these higher-priced devices, typically in the hands of business customers.

However convenience is important to business customers -- PC Cards and USB modems are far more convenient than phones for broadband connectivity. Adding complexity to the analysis is the growing penetration of embedded cellular connectivity in laptops and notebooks, which will reduce the need for external devices.

How does this apply to consumers and to developing world regions? Any operator can drop the price for mobile broadband using the phone as the modem, which is more amenable to a broad customer base regardless of world region.

But the questions remain -- how will this pricing change detract from use of the phone for other revenue-generating services? And, does it perpetuate the perception of the wireless operator as the dumb pipe provider?

The ABI Research study provides a comprehensive overview of the market for cellular modems. The report analyzes the factors both driving and inhibiting growth and examines how changes in the market are creating both opportunity and complexity for the value-chain participants.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...