Skip to main content

Why U.S. DSL has Become the New Dial-up

The second quarter proved to be one of the most challenging on record for U.S. broadband service providers, according to the most current market study by Strategy Analytics.

Broadband service providers added only one million net additional subscriptions in Q208, compared to over two million in the previous quarter.

Particularly hard-hit were the telcos, some of which experienced a 90 percent sequential quarterly drop in net subscriber additions. Cable companies fared slightly better, which provided the only positive news in an otherwise lackluster market.

"The dramatic downturn in the quarter is largely attributable to a slowdown of new subscriber connects, as well as consumer migration from DSL to cable," noted John Lee, Analyst in the Strategy Analytics Multiplay Market Dynamics service.

"As home users become more accustomed to high speeds at the office or elsewhere (like visits abroad), they are less willing to tolerate slow performance in their home."

U.S. telco customers apparently quickly discover the limitations of DSL, and they wonder what they might experience if they had "real" broadband. However, even the U.S. cable company broadband speeds really can't compare to the European and Asia-Pacific benchmark for real broadband.

Ben Piper, Director of the Strategy Analytics Multiplay Market Dynamics service added, "The telco's core DSL offerings are unable to compete effectively with cable; they must step up their already frenetic fiber roll out just to stay in the game. Indeed, we are starting to see DSL become the new dial-up."

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...