Skip to main content

B2B Magazine Publishers are Still in Tailspin


According to eMarketer, when the American Business Media (ABM) Annual Conference was held recently in Amelia Island, Florida, most of the speeches were optimistic.

Reviewing the financial performances of business-to-business (B2B) publishers in print, online, events and data from 2006 to 2008, Richard Mead, managing director of The Jordan, Edmiston Group, said, "This has all been part of a controlled evolution."

That's a little like saying driving a car off a cliff is all part of a controlled stop. With equal denial of recent industry performance Gary Fitzgerald, CEO of Meister Media Worldwide and chairman of the ABM, said, "It's a time of great opportunity."

Unlike the spoken words, however, eMarketer says that the data presented at the conference was more sobering. According to the ABM, B2B media ad pages declined 30 percent in the first two months of this year. And last year was not good, either.

Looking first at the B2B publisher's largest source of revenues, print, the ABM found display advertising was down 9.9 percent from 2007 to 2008, and classified advertising was down 16.9 percent over the same period, for a net ad revenue loss of 10.2 percent.

Total print revenues were off 7.7 percent to slightly over $1.2 billion.

The online revenues of B2B publications have shown steady growth. Of the six B2B media company revenue categories tracked -- magazines, custom publishing, data, online, trade shows and conferences -- online revenues showed the strongest growth, increasing 15.1 percent in 2008 to reach $360 million.

Many of the media executives at the conference were apparently focused on digital media and generating more revenues from Internet initiatives.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Every Tech Vendor Needs a Real AI Story

Every product roadmap conversation with a technology vendor now runs through one filter that has nothing to do with the roadmap itself: does the company have an AI story that a buyer's finance team would actually underwrite. Forrester Research just gave that gut check a formal structure. Its newly introduced AI Disruption Model evaluates 17 technology and service categories, spanning more than 200 individual markets, against nine factors including AI substitutability, labor intensity, and switching costs. The finding that should reorder tech vendor strategy conversations this quarter is not which markets grow. It is how few of them do, and what that scarcity means for everyone else. Only Three Categories Get an Unambiguous Green Light According to the research, infrastructure providers such as cloud platforms, data centers, and storage; data and AI providers spanning models, platforms, and governance tooling; and cybersecurity and identity providers covering zero trust and AI agent...