Skip to main content

Online Video Sites May Adopt Pay-TV Model


According to an eMarketer report, an August 2009 survey provides more insightful datapoints for the ongoing debate about consumer interest in paid (rental) versus free (advertiser supported) services that deliver online video.

Digitalsmiths found that more than 70 percent of U.S. Internet users surveyed had watched online video in the past week, and more than one-half had watched online TV programs.

When asked whether they would pay to watch television programs on demand on a computer or mobile device, online video viewers were split. While 22.6 percent of viewers said they were at least somewhat likely to sign up for such a service, more than three in ten claimed they definitely would not.

Online video viewers similarly disagreed on whether they would pay a rental fee to stream movies on demand.

The eMarketer report highlighted this split among online video viewers. Most would prefer to watch video for free, but a significant minority is willing to pay in order to avoid at least some advertising.

That suggests a hybrid model of reduced advertising along with smaller fees -- similar to cable TV.

"Video destinations that offer extensive content in exchange for fewer ads and lower fees would likely attract a large audience," said eMarketer senior analyst David Hallerman. "That, in turn, would create a robust platform for video ads in an uncluttered environment."

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...