Skip to main content

Buyer Influence and Social Media Marketing


According to the latest eMarketer assessment, consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies and social media marketing are not a logical mix. CPG companies tend to focus on attempting to reach a passive "mass audience" of docile consumers -- while social media is more focused on actively engaging independent-thinking people.

"By looking at social media as a way to listen to consumers, respond to their needs and create ongoing dialogue -- instead of as another way to advertise to them -- CPG companies can reinvigorate their marketing and create new bonds with consumers," said Debra Aho Williamson, eMarketer senior analyst.

The CPG industry is turning its attention toward online advertising, but remains firmly committed to traditional media. Spending on social network advertising represents only a small fraction of the total investment going to that channel, according to Nielsen AdRelevance.

Still, the Nielsen figures represent only image-based ad spending, and do not include any other social marketing outlays. Some CPG companies wisely consider social media engagement to be something that's earned, rather than something you buy. They invest in promotional interactions and blogger relations -- rather than CPM-based display advertising.

Measuring the link between social media engagement and sales is made more difficult by the fact that many CPG products, such as cake mix and soda, are not typically purchased online. But, that doesn't mean that online engagement can't influence off-line buyer behavior.

So, why don't more companies attempt to influence purchases with meaningful information and guidance? Clearly, the decisive content that's missing from most marketing communications is substantive "how-to" insight that aids people to select a product from all the other alternatives.

Popular posts from this blog

Navigating AI Implementation Challenges in 2025

As we approach 2025, the global Artificial Intelligence (AI) market is poised for significant growth. Traditional AI spending is rising, while Generative AI (GenAI) struggles to meet lofty expectations. This apparent dichotomy presents challenges and opportunities for vendors and business leaders navigating the complex world of AI implementation. Let's explore the overall situation. Traditional AI: A Pragmatic Approach In the coming year, we expect to see a surge in traditional AI spending as enterprises seek pragmatic, ROI-driven solutions. This trend is driven by a growing recognition of the limitations and risks associated with GenAI projects, which have shown alarmingly high failure rates of 80 to 90 percent in proof-of-concept stages. The trend towards traditional AI is further supported by data from Amazon Web Services (AWS), which revealed that over 85 percent of AI projects in 2024 were not based on GenAI.  This insightful statistic underscores the continued relevance and ...