Skip to main content

Video Subscription versus Pay-per-View Model

Pay-TV Video on Demand (VoD) that's delivered directly to the television is generating consumer interest, but very little revenue for service providers. Free content currently accounts for more than 95 percent of the video being watched.

A new pay-TV market study by Futuresource Consulting predicts that some consumers will pay extra for movies on demand. The question that remains is what's the consumer-preferred method -- payment by monthly subscription, or pay-per-view?

Futuresource forecasts that by 2013, transactional (pay-per-view) revenues from movies on demand will reach $2.4 billion in the USA and 430 million Euros in the leading five Western European countries.

"The rise of on-demand video content that can be accessed through a laptop, PC or mobile phone shows no signs of stopping," says Carl Hibbert, Business Consultant, Futuresource, "and with so much competition out there, the consumer is in the driving seat, demanding entertainment be delivered on their terms, whenever, wherever and however they please."

The pay-TV industry is looking to VoD to supplement its linear scheduled TV offering. As well as improving their consumer proposition, reducing customer churn and recalibrating their brand positioning. Operators are attempting to use VoD to drive up the average revenue per user (ARPU), rather than improve their actual profit.

Paid-for VoD is a small part of the market, but it is expanding, and that's despite the glut of readily-available free and catch-up VoD. Growth opportunities are coming from the continued conversion of analogue to digital cable, the expansion of IPTV, and the introduction of hybrid services by satellite operators.

As movie release windows shorten and VoD releases come on stream day-and-date with DVD and Blu-ray, Futuresource believes we're going to see more traction. That said, a number of studios are holding back, believing this may cannibalize their packaged media revenues.

Apparently, improved electronic program guides (EPG) will also help to boost VoD buy rates, making content search and purchase easier, and in some cases allowing for more personalized services.

In this context, the definition of "personalization" seems subjective.

Futuresource says that the next user experience enhancement is "lifestyle-orientated" TV homepages, which will help to filter and focus all the live and on-demand content available. Thereby enabling the consumer to pinpoint and purchase relevant content as soon as it becomes available.

In contrast, I believe that a truly personalized "recommendation-oriented" playlist -- similar to the Netflix member Queue concept -- will become the most preferred method to consume video. Furthermore, the flat-fee monthly subscription model will gain more adopters than the legacy pay-per-view model.

Popular posts from this blog

Global Rise of Domestic Payment Ecosystems

Alternative Payment Methods (APMs) – comprising digital wallets, instant payments, and QR payment systems – are experiencing explosive growth that's reshaping the global financial services marketplace. According to the latest worldwide market study by ABI Research , the combined global transaction value for APMs is projected to reach $142 trillion by 2030. What's particularly fascinating is the underlying driver behind this trend: a growing desire for financial sovereignty, with nations developing domestic payment ecosystems rather than remaining dependent on international financial networks. Payment Ecosystem Market Development In 2024, approximately 45 percent of the global population used digital wallets – a remarkable adoption rate for a technology that barely existed a decade ago. China leads this transition, with 95 percent of its population using WeChat's payment functionality. WeChat exemplifies the "super app" phenomenon, where payment capabilities are in...