Skip to main content

Digital Home Entertainment Worth $233 Billion

Three sectors of the digital entertainment ecosystem -- device manufacturers and retailers, content producers, and service providers -- have much different visions of the home entertainment future, according to the latest market study by In-Stat.

Each industry sector will continue to try to mold the future to its advantage.

"In the TV and video ecosystem, operators and media companies want to avoid what happened in digital music, where Apple dominates the digital music ecosystem," says Keith Nissen, In-Stat analyst.

As Web-to-TV initiatives accelerate, pay TV operators TV-Everywhere concepts must deliver more than just TV content on a PC screen. It must deliver a complimentary web-based video experience to any screen. Meanwhile, media companies must balance existing distribution channels with new over-the-top (OTT) opportunities.

In-Stat's market study found the following:

- Exclusive live sports and TV events are a key competitive advantage for pay-TV operators.

- Device manufacturers and retailers have bet heavily on the adoption of Blu-ray technology, which has been slow to take hold.

- High value content will migrate to premium channels, benefiting pay-TV subscription revenue.

- Video content on the Internet, or Over-the-Top Video (OTT) video services, will be a net positive for content producers that correctly navigate the rapidly changing distribution channels and business models.

- The value of the home digital entertainment market in the U.S. will total $233 billion by 2013.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...