Skip to main content

Digital Marketing Practitioners Walk the Walk


Marketers continue to shift their budgets from traditional to digital media, but simply including online ad campaigns and social media efforts is not enough for an effective marketing mix, reports eMarketer.

According to Alterian's assessment, the maturity of digital and social media requires integration of marketing strategies. Marketers must move from a focus on isolated campaigns to an emphasis on listening to and communicating across channels.

In this study, more than one-half of marketers worldwide reported directing their efforts toward integrating their communication strategies to emphasize multichannel engagement.

The majority of marketers surveyed recognized social media as increasingly important to the marketing mix, while only 14 percent said it's "critical" for their success.

Most marketers say they're "prepared enough" to take advantage of new techniques in digital and social media, but more than one-third felt "minimally prepared" at best.

The largest group of respondents said some of their marketing staff "had the skills" to implement new customer engagement strategies, but that knowledge was generally restricted to personnel in digital roles.

Only 17 percent said most, or all, of their staff was adequately prepared.

"Engaging with customers is becoming paramount and the yardstick by which we measure those brands that survive and those that don't," said David Eldridge, CEO of Alterian. "Marketers now need to appeal to the individual and engage with customers on a one-to-one basis."

So, who is qualified to lead digital marketing strategy? Those who have proven they participate in engagement will leave a substantive impression of their online activities. In contrast, those who are appointed as managers by their company, but have minimal experience, can do little more than merely talk the talk.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...