Skip to main content

Why U.S. Publishers Seek e-Book Salvation



The Amazon Kindle e-reader and online e-bookstore has spawned a paid e-publishing content marketplace that has grown in the past two years. But, is this truly the profitability salvation that print publishers had hoped for?

Competition from other device makers -- such as Apple -- promises to further stimulate what is already one of the most dynamic areas of the digital content ecosystem.

Sales of e-books have grown steadily since the format first appeared in the early 2000 time frame. The Association of American Publishers (AAP) estimated that U.S. net sales to its 85 member publishers totaled $169.5 million in 2009 -- up 176.5 percent from the 2008 figure of $61.3 million.

In fact, revenue for 2009 was the highest ever, and the percentage gain was the greatest since e-books started producing a profit.

"Currently, most e-book volume comes from Amazon.com's Kindle Wireless Reading Device sales," said Paul Verna, eMarketer senior analyst. "But it is unlikely that Amazon.com will be able to hold on to such a dominant market as e-book pricing becomes more competitive and more complicated."

In newspaper and magazine publishing, opportunities are less tangible than for books, and monetization models are in flux.

Several publishers are looking to experiment with paid models after ad-supported efforts have fallen short. Existing paid plans included metered access, freemiums, 100 percent subscription sites and even donations in one case.

But many studies already demonstrated that consumers are very reluctant to pay up for news content -- unless it's truly of exceptional quality.

"Consumers will resist paying for content," Mr. Verna said, "especially in cases where they feel they can find the same quality information elsewhere online for free."

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...