Skip to main content

Why U.S. Publishers Seek e-Book Salvation



The Amazon Kindle e-reader and online e-bookstore has spawned a paid e-publishing content marketplace that has grown in the past two years. But, is this truly the profitability salvation that print publishers had hoped for?

Competition from other device makers -- such as Apple -- promises to further stimulate what is already one of the most dynamic areas of the digital content ecosystem.

Sales of e-books have grown steadily since the format first appeared in the early 2000 time frame. The Association of American Publishers (AAP) estimated that U.S. net sales to its 85 member publishers totaled $169.5 million in 2009 -- up 176.5 percent from the 2008 figure of $61.3 million.

In fact, revenue for 2009 was the highest ever, and the percentage gain was the greatest since e-books started producing a profit.

"Currently, most e-book volume comes from Amazon.com's Kindle Wireless Reading Device sales," said Paul Verna, eMarketer senior analyst. "But it is unlikely that Amazon.com will be able to hold on to such a dominant market as e-book pricing becomes more competitive and more complicated."

In newspaper and magazine publishing, opportunities are less tangible than for books, and monetization models are in flux.

Several publishers are looking to experiment with paid models after ad-supported efforts have fallen short. Existing paid plans included metered access, freemiums, 100 percent subscription sites and even donations in one case.

But many studies already demonstrated that consumers are very reluctant to pay up for news content -- unless it's truly of exceptional quality.

"Consumers will resist paying for content," Mr. Verna said, "especially in cases where they feel they can find the same quality information elsewhere online for free."

Popular posts from this blog

Frontier AI Peaked. Here's What Comes Next

The prevailing narrative around artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless scale. Bigger models, bigger clusters, bigger budgets. The assumption, largely unchallenged until recently, was that raw parameter count translated directly into competitive advantage. New research from Omdia suggests it's time to retire that assumption. According to the latest market study by Omdia, parameter growth in frontier AI models has slowed to around 5 percent annually since 2021, a stark contrast to the more than hundredfold expansion seen between 2019 and 2021. Enterprise AI Market Development For executives who have been making infrastructure and investment decisions based on the assumption that AI would keep demanding ever-larger, ever-more-expensive hardware, this finding deserves serious attention. The race to the top of the model size leaderboard has, at least for now, plateaued. Crucially, Omdia's analysts are not reading this as an AI winter. Alexander Harrowell, senior pri...