Skip to main content

Capitalizing on the Demand for Media Tablets

When ABI Research first examined the media tablet market, neither the Apple iPad nor any other major brand tablet had been released. Six months later, the firm has revisited its forecasts -- almost tripling the original estimate to reach about 11 million tablets expected to ship by the end of 2010.

ABI's long-term estimates, however, has remained basically unchanged.

"Our forecast of 11 million media tablet shipments in 2010 is based both on the broader availability of the iPad and on the delayed introduction of competing products," says ABI Research principal analyst Jeff Orr.

Assuming that competing tablets from other vendors do arrive in the second half of the year as expected, ABI believes that the iPad will account for a significant portion -- but not all -- of the projected 11 million units.

To capitalize on the usual fourth quarter sales boom, other tablets need to reach retailer shelves by early September.

Orr suggests that the media tablet segment is still far short of a mass-market and that significant shipment volume probably won't be reached before 2013. Much depends on Apple's distribution reach, which is still quite limited, and the relative success of its eventual competitors.

A number of competing tablets were to have been launched by now, but the global recession, implementation of the most suitable operating system, and the challenge of matching the iPad's user experience have all caused delays.

"The buzz around tablets has implications for other parts of the consumer electronics market," Orr continues.

In particular, the surge in interest in media tablets is impacting the MID (Mobile Internet Device) category. Most of the volume that ABI has projected for the MID category since 2007 is now being taken over by other device form factors -- such as media tablets, but also mobile smartphones.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...