Skip to main content

U.S. OTT Video Revenue to Quadruple by 2014

Innovative leaders in the over-the-top (OTT) video market are positioning themselves for what is anticipated to be a high-growth market with multi-billion dollar revenue streams, according to the latest market study by In-Stat.

As an example, companies such as Netflix, Blockbuster, Wal-Mart, Best Buy, YouTube, and Hulu are all vying for market share growth in the U.S. marketplace. While these American companies may be leading the field today, it's clear that the ongoing transition in video entertainment distribution is a global phenomenon.

"OTT video is happening now, with over 37 million broadband households in the U.S. downloading online video content," says Keith Nissen, In-Stat analyst. "The growing adoption of both OTT video consumption and web-enabled consumer electronics promises to further expand the opportunity content producers and OTT retailers."

In-Stat says that they define "Over-the-top" as any video content delivered via a broadband connection from a source other than the network service provider. Not to be confused with telco IPTV, which is typically a service clone of traditional pay-TV offerings from cable and satellite providers.

In-Stat's market study found the following:

- U.S. broadband households that view OTT video will grow from 38 million in 2009 to 81 million by 2014.

- Revenue from OTT video will more than quadruple by 2014 as it approaches $20 billion.

- A primary success criteria for OTT video services is access to unique, first-run TV and movie content.

- Over one-third of the 18–24 year old adult households stream full-length OTT video on a regular basis, compared to less than 10 percent of adult households in the over 45 year-old age brackets.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...