Skip to main content

Why Residential Broadband in U.S. Should Cost Less

According the the latest market study by Point Topic, there's a pattern of broadband access cross-subsidization across most parts of the world.

"Residential broadband is apparently being subsidized by businesses almost everywhere in the world -- the exception is North America," says Oliver Johnson, CEO of Point Topic.

Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in most markets are charging households considerably less than businesses for Internet access. This is a mechanism to cope with competitive pressure and gain residential subscriber market share.

"There are a number of differences of course. Business tariffs often are less contended than residential ones and come with better help desk services and guarantees of up-time but surprisingly not generally faster," continues Johnson.

Add to this the exchange rates, the relative buying power of a dollar in a particular market and so on and it's a very complex picture. As a simple exercise however we can examine the relative ratios of the average of 2000 residential and business tariffs in different regions of the world.

"By looking at just standalone tariffs, those without a VoIP or IPTV service, we can assume that between markets we are comparing similar products overall -- that is to say just the bandwidth," says Johnson.

In North America (USA and Canada) a business will pay 2.38 times as much for a DSL connection as a household. This compares to a multiple of 4.23 on average in the Rest of the World (RoW).

In North America a business will pay 1.13 times as much as a household for FTTx and 1.89 times as much for a cable service. In the RoW a business will on average pay 6.47 times as much for FTTx and for cable the multiple is 1.93 times.

The result is that households in the U.S. and Canada will typically pay between 10 and 20 percent more for their broadband service than their counterparts in other regions of the world.

The gap is at least partly due to the differential in residential and business tariffs. North American operators are extracting a better ARPU from their household services while sacrificing some revenue from companies.

"This approach may be more robust in the medium to long term but it's also an opportunity. Where there actually is competition in the North American region there is room for price cuts for residential customers and a gain in market share for the operators that are prepared to take the plunge," concludes Johnson.

Popular posts from this blog

Digital Grids Reshape the Future of Electricity

What was once a simple, unidirectional flow of electricity from centralized power plants to passive consumers is evolving into a complex, intelligent network where millions of distributed resources actively participate in grid operations. This transformation, powered by smart grid technologies, represents one of the most significant infrastructure shifts of our time. It promises to reshape how we generate, distribute, and consume energy. At its core, the smart grid represents far more than mere digitization of existing infrastructure.  This bi-directional capability is fundamental to understanding why smart grids are becoming the backbone of modern energy systems, facilitating everything from real-time demand response to the integration of renewable energy sources. Smart Grid Market Development By 2030, smart grid technologies are projected to cover nearly half of the global electrical grid, up dramatically from just 24 percent in 2025. This expansion is underpinned by explosive gr...