Skip to main content

Why the e-Reader Market Share is Still Growing

Last year, purpose-built new e-readers were one of the most popular devices in the consumer electronics (CE) marketplace. Today, there is still plenty of consumer interest surrounding the e-reader market.

However, the industry analysts are forecasting ongoing price erosion, targeted competition from the Apple iPad, and the continued overall sustainability of the standalone e-reader shipment growth.

Therefore, despite the potential impact that the tablet PC market may have on the standalone e-reader market, e-reader shipments will grow from 12 million units by the end of this year, to 35 million in 2014, according to the latest market study by In-Stat.

"Tablet PC shipments are taking off, fueled in particular by the Apple iPad introduction. Yet, there will still be a revenue opportunity for e-reader suppliers and OEMs since tablet PCs and e-readers target different consumers," says Stephanie Ethier, Senior Analyst, In-Stat.

Standalone e-readers will address the needs of avid readers, to whom the reading experience is central to their product selection criteria. In contrast, tablets are better suited for consumers who prefer a stronger multimedia experience, and only light reading.

In-Stat's latest market study found the following:

- E-reader price points will continue to fall over the remainder of 2010, with a $99 model likely available in time for the upcoming holiday season.

- Tablet unit shipments will reach approximately 58 million in 2014.

- Among the semiconductor devices used in e-readers, the processor ASP will be the most resilient over the forecast period, only declining 18 percent from 2009 to 2014. Despite significant increases in NAND Flash densities, the dollar value of Flash declines 60 percent over the same period.

- The semiconductor total addressable market for e-reader suppliers will exceed one billion dollars in 2011.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...