Skip to main content

Fewer U.S. Broadband Subscriber Adds in 2010

According to the latest market study by Leichtman Research Group (LRG), the nineteen largest cable and telephone providers in the U.S. -- representing about 93 percent of the total market -- acquired 330,000 net additional high-speed Internet subscribers in the second quarter of 2010.

Net broadband additions in the quarter were the fewest of any quarter in the nine years LRG has been tracking the industry. That said, it's not clear what is responsible for the significant decline. Is it still the economic environment, is the market fully saturated at the current price points, are limited-time price incentives not attractive to the prospective customers?

Other key findings from the market study include:

- The top phone companies had a net loss of about 7,500 subscribers -- compared to a gain of 385,000 subscribers in 2Q 2009.

- AT&T had a net loss of 92,000 subscribers in the quarter -- this is the first time that any of the top ten broadband providers reported a quarterly net subscriber loss.

- AT&T and Verizon added 451,000 fiber subscribers in the quarter (via U-verse and FiOS), while having a net loss of 515,000 DSL subscribers.

- The top cable companies added over 335,000 broadband subscribers -- about 140 percent of the additions of a year ago.

- Overall, broadband additions in 2Q 2010 fell to only 53 percent of those in 2Q 2009.

The top broadband providers now account for about 73.5 million subscribers -- with cable companies having 40.5 million broadband subscribers, and telephone companies having over 32.9 million subscribers.

The top cable broadband providers now have a 55 percent share of the overall market -- a slight increase from the 54 percent share of the market they had at the end of 2Q 2009.

Popular posts from this blog

Bold Broadband Policy: Yes We Can, America

Try to imagine this scenario, that General Motors and Ford were given exclusive franchises to build America's interstate highway system, and also all the highways that connect local communities. Now imagine that, based upon a financial crisis, these troubled companies decided to convert all "their" local arteries into toll-roads -- they then use incremental toll fees to severely limit all travel to and from small businesses. Why? This handicapping process reduced the need to invest in building better new roads, or repairing the dilapidated ones. But, wouldn't that short-sighted decision have a detrimental impact on the overall national economy? It's a moot point -- pure fantasy -- you say. The U.S. political leadership would never knowingly risk the nation's social and economic future on the financial viability of a restrictive duopoly. Or, would they? The 21st century Global Networked Economy travels across essential broadband infrastructure. The forced intro...